There's a 'u' in "Squïrrel". You have no proof that she was walking. I'm surprised that your overly-pedantic attitude from posts above didn't cause you to complain that she could have been availing herself of any number of modes of transport; eg. cycling, skateboarding, rollerblading, skiting, land yachting, parasailing, hang-gliding, etc, etc.
And Squïrrel, don't forget that the street might actually be a Möbius strip in a zero gravity alien spaceship and she was just walking in the wrong direction under the top street...
Except that Council by-law 3471.62f(i) states that "vehicles capable of generating zero-G fields are not permitted in one-way streets", and 3471.62f(ii) states that "one-way streets are not permitted in vehicles capable of generating zero-G fields. Penalty: $40"
Ok, you hold Evan down so I can give him another kicking.
6 comments:
Maybe she was reversing the vehicle to parallel park which is permitted in most jurisdictions.
she was walking there
Where's my pellet gun? There's a crazy sqirrel wandering around.
She was walking.
There's a 'u' in "Squïrrel". You have no proof that she was walking. I'm surprised that your overly-pedantic attitude from posts above didn't cause you to complain that she could have been availing herself of any number of modes of transport; eg. cycling, skateboarding, rollerblading, skiting, land yachting, parasailing, hang-gliding, etc, etc.
And Squïrrel, don't forget that the street might actually be a Möbius strip in a zero gravity alien spaceship and she was just walking in the wrong direction under the top street...
LOL!
Except that Council by-law 3471.62f(i) states that "vehicles capable of generating zero-G fields are not permitted in one-way streets", and 3471.62f(ii) states that "one-way streets are not permitted in vehicles capable of generating zero-G fields. Penalty: $40"
Ok, you hold Evan down so I can give him another kicking.
Post a Comment